public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/113134] gcc does not version loops with early break conditions that don't have side-effects Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 04:05:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113134-4-RsYt21tM5g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113134 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You may be able to use the same approach as else if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo)) that is, reverse both the mask and the vector and using extract last. It's not going to be performance critical so it's more important to be correct rather than fast.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-28 4:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-12-25 11:29 [Bug c/113134] New: Middle end early break vectorization: Fail to vectorize a simple early break code juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-25 12:35 ` [Bug c/113134] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-27 15:21 ` [Bug c/113134] gcc does not version loops with side-effect early breaks tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 1:21 ` [Bug c/113134] gcc does not version loops with early break conditions that don't have side-effects juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 3:48 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 3:55 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 4:02 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 4:05 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-12-28 4:23 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 4:30 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 4:35 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 4:45 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 4:46 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 4:49 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 4:51 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 4:53 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 5:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-12-28 9:11 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-12-28 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113134] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-08 8:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-31 11:48 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-02 3:38 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-02-02 8:49 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113134-4-RsYt21tM5g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).