From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A37F33858D38; Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:34:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A37F33858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703788443; bh=W7Ue3cVNhALZR1iSO2meJz4K3gL9+co6t/2Z/whTTMo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MhH6RTHGP4uprPnoGdSAPGT9C72q+cpct7dZkt1bW6fszY5wN/Mq8x9M1qVnxfy2N w9f/Np/btFJJn8uC1ckEBddiIv0ygsflV/ivs441yeeghYL92Y2dEonhOeEXnMq5ij cddzah5QUYjGeWTNTfhCPyavWE7gSLspx8287EMo= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113159] More robust std::sort for silly comparator functions Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:34:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113159 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2023-12-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I disagree, it's a perfectly valid wish. But somebody needs to work on it, = or nothing will happen and it will just stay open forever.=