From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6E732385842A; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 18:01:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E732385842A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703959292; bh=0J2hZFbSRn+ribglSJx2hZlXc+zIYrhPt/ZcHOSxmyM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wBnlMfEKqlGkuTqJ6lDBr5VVMHyRx1eaRnIlbSbpzxv4eVl4qCTUi91uPdnZUDCoH BkKbBkY/ULALTKTdAnwVYSRwT7UCTT6DkhEZsEUBD7jgllgRoBw/AicTNW7s/kbbtb 2fUtpDte1+tV4vlE78OpQz57rDpcD5TZiQDpI9wM= From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113175] [14 Regression] testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc 5x times slower Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 18:01:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget short_desc component Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113175 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|mmix-knuth-mmixware |mmix-knuth-mmixware, | |x86_64-linux-gnu Summary|[14 Regression] MMIX: |[14 Regression] |testsuite/std/ranges/iota/m |testsuite/std/ranges/iota/m |ax_size_type.cc 5x times |ax_size_type.cc 5x times |slower |slower Component|target |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- I'm afraid this isn't target-specific. I bootstrapped native x86_64-linux-gnu off the both source trees, and ran \= time env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D(long curse) ./max_size_type.exe r12-2797-g307e0d40367996: 0.32user 0.00system 0:00.32elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2620maxresiden= t)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+184minor)pagefaults 0swaps r14-6859-gd1eacedc6d9b: 1.73user 0.00system 0:01.73elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 3564maxreside= nt)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+194minor)pagefaults 0swaps ...which is a factor of about 5.4, consistent with the MMIX observation. Still unknown whether libstdc++ or code-generator of course, but I'm leaning towards the latter, for the same reasons as in the precious comment. Maybe= the test-case triggers peculiar details.=