From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 186B2386F440; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:25:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 186B2386F440
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704997508;
	bh=JLRfaDJ4ev/3O8i9GnPEgm09/fIoddnH6PnaQSN8Iho=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kioSSbMQiFmBwwBFtTle4HPpxGqQIrhOATJ1NYbmdp3C9kBTtD+hGP3JtIacM9zMX
	 vdcgyhpCa2S28IKgd/wLwx47Y0i+/qO2ZSnatM78A+1iOkPvRTOSkPJNg/scGYfC0H
	 MhnsxQjGf6k3J1DTc2F2HEpxvx+yexjvTShMnvsw=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113182] [14 Regression] FAIL:
 g++.dg/cpp0x/udlit-namespace.C  -std=c++14 execution test
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:25:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113182-4-ZiOt1hjarD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113182

--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The allocation is completely intentional, exactly to be able to track wheth=
er
it was referenced or not.  Otherwise the exercise makes no sense.=