From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F2A2C3858C98; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 02:30:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2A2C3858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1703989814;
	bh=bg2cQhQRjCoNK9YQpxDzPnVJO8VLPs1keW/s3apZr44=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kn8mLKNrZFQvLzXBL4z3cthXGwhlh+M7hX4HyJfHeQ6Tfxwm07Uk5reG0jPZZhAmS
	 lu6j/IP1ZHhryxyWN7ZBcXEoElOMsrvHI/Q1+Z1fnjUgu8sGECxGU+Eu6/Y48P7/Cu
	 aAR+DhnCswpb/jiGLi9Q8rnha/CKVr0tEm4l4CRE=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113185] bad performance on big-endian&64bit port for
 struct 16 16
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 02:30:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113185-4-430HfcbhHl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113185

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue is with the argument passing. I thought there was a dup of this b=
ug
somewhere ...=