From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F14CF3858D32; Tue,  2 Jan 2024 21:43:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F14CF3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704231784;
	bh=+SiVDeVJbb2z5Tcq4oGYqhRKmms25R4kxsHO4+g2C1I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XyFC6QLpDvQSX9ugwcYzNoer30YOJbSNJpNTOavCpIHxRWL9XS0MV5gxM0hfm1u+Y
	 05a/UuNu9lL6ES5MmDJ8IVG9/XR7bJ44HD3nI8+MBCq3kMJW2SsEHHBiW/s1GdFn0q
	 F4bJh96nnI/feY76Ep110RpkDPiDivVpoi5oORPg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113201] [14 Regression] internal compiler
 error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in replace_uses_by, at
 tree-cfg.cc:2058
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 21:43:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-113201-4-rB1ogmdJyx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113201

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-02

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.

Here is a testcase that does not depend on the name of the functions:
```
void f(void)  __attribute__((returns_twice));
void g(void);
void h(void) {
  int bh;
  f();
  while (--bh)
    ;
  g();
}
```=