From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2A5FE3858D38; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:43:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2A5FE3858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711410191;
	bh=e6DTxwcO8n8fVhH72jAelQnXMvcNa0mhyONdYIQl2AI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PKX9BFsV/xtDdHE0GkDi3Dwv+qxJDQ4Gk2pv2QOvo4JLlQbHunilK8BhsGDjN6KWJ
	 kkWwKy5qDabIxFtqUUJJS7//z1d+a3rZVi6GXKf67jZfCentxmlZxDrB4VcySf62Uw
	 zOKCdPUlyk6Z1XKNg/tvckgrr6IJ9rvqt3xrGJxA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's
 comdat groups differs since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:43:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113208-4-UD0etucbqH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113208

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-03-25
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> I will redo the reduction to make sure it is valid.

I have not had the time to do the re-reduction. so I will let someone else
handle that if needed. Note it might be the case where we have ICF doing the
alias which causes the difference but I am not 100% sure there.

Anyways confirmed with my reduction with the soruces in comment #16, #17 and
#18.=