From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 850FA3858CDA; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:48:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 850FA3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713196129;
	bh=wQqtbWCH5O9chFYxrQOiMah3ExCvEweEnM5gHyqNAPY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bFuZbBC0yyBjTnqAK3LQtBjQc4DRI4NwGPLg8tCerynZOJSTgQMfDCT2+RCIBsopA
	 DzQJkMq4jlY4FED+EIggMwTWheE0jSR/J7Qw1VWiVhXVp7qWeOZ02dH5lgJCHclAZJ
	 o6i4QdLWMGM3LSi5vYvQjAH1V/KmZwpDsecbyyWs=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's
 comdat groups differs since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:48:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113208-4-eOTk2tL0S3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113208

--- Comment #26 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #25)
>=20
> If constexpr changes how the constructor is generated, isn't this violati=
on
> of ODR?

Note the original code didn't have the constexpr change. And IIRC constexpr=
 in
libstdc++ might be different depending on the language, C++11 vs C++17 in m=
any
cases too.=