From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2EBD33858408; Wed,  3 Jan 2024 05:25:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2EBD33858408
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704259522;
	bh=WHkAFF5zUdgv2YLPSpgAal3wU/zF57vrq/KGGvZ8LaU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=io5XlKe1DqAOGQA2svxZTzPDZINeXkvPz4dZWL0Y9wf0mE2i+yuz31hAuQ6KZfjfI
	 DeIGoGO2ckBCryDXi5W2SXxMvimejnF/TwQbb2W5OI1n6ERQfQ0N5XdCXmcCfXMeO+
	 dVPTOuFHhlztrvG83CtAlUNKmKfNxPxlxJUvjKcQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113211] Trying to initialize the tripwire database ends up
 with a SEGV if a uid cannot be found
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:25:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113211-4-AmApo7eeQf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113211-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113211-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113211

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-03
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why do you think this is a GCC bug rather than a glibc or systemd issue?

Looking at the assembly that you provided:
   0x00007ffff7bf869f <+15>:    call   0x7ffff7bf7c80 <__tls_get_addr@plt>
=3D> 0x00007ffff7bf86a4 <+20>:    mov    0x1c(%rax),%eax

That looks correct, RAX is the return value of __tls_get_addr here.

Note __tls_get_addr is not implemented by GCC but by glibc.=