From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D342A3858C62; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:38:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D342A3858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704299890; bh=L6Tonlp0UFlhVkWvXEOyaAYM4cOdKZHmFd40R1jX0sI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=SOjoiH4zae+2flAvv1ktHnDeZhQ1oT5MvqGN3kh8LW+Ct/yIuKt6D8PacrGXhAMlF 2VDKOw3nKlk/mmb/OF7rSgGLqN9Ccv6dUgVvvbkg39bDPeSC8TsEbi/Yvxf9jFuZez bjg7eQWbZq+nW7fC+2mc2cdZMzXVGQdV5Xf9WRcM= From: "m.cencora at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/113219] New: Overloaded ref-qualified conversion operator triggers bogus -Wconversion Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 16:38:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: m.cencora at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113219 Bug ID: 113219 Summary: Overloaded ref-qualified conversion operator triggers bogus -Wconversion Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: m.cencora at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Following code when compiled on any gcc version (checked all available on godbolt since gcc-7) triggers conversion warnings. I consider it bogus because it tells user that it has chosen a better overl= oad (which is good thing, right?). Clang doesn't print any related warning even with -Weverything g++ -std=3Dc++17 -Wconversion template struct wrapper { operator T() const&; operator T&&() &&; }; wrapper createInt(); int test() { return createInt(); } Output is: :13:21: warning: choosing 'wrapper::operator T&&() && [with T =3D int]' over 'wrapper::operator T() const & [with T =3D int]' [-Wconversio= n] 13 | return createInt(); | ~~~~~~~~~^~ :13:21: warning: for conversion from 'wrapper' to 'int' [-Wconversion] :13:21: note: because conversion sequence for the argument is bet= ter=