From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9812D3858CD1; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:05:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9812D3858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704337501; bh=lFyJS9/anfdpk5h3G7uZNNQPjTJLIaRK7h3swLxJ1sw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k33EGXb/PVpszc+OVTw12hduqpc0AuMI+HkbTFbH3KoMqdx6BUKH+CrdVGUEfIA6n MhoohOwC4FEKXDiM5oxglyOxk9yA+IaeMzuN9FgH2mVOjSsNRIiZD/9dcOifkU0rWL QS/f7ZyhOA7NPQg+1HWyULMACn3bVzH1Ei4Nu09U= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/113228] [14 Regression] ICE: recalculate_side_effects, at gimplify.cc:3347 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:05:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113228 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #1) > int k[3]; It would better if we didn't depend on an uninitialized variable (I have a patch against reassoc to not handle uninitialized/undef names) and initiali= zing k as: ``` int k[3]=3D{0,0,0}; ``` Still shows the issue ...=