From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7B1D23858409; Thu,  4 Jan 2024 16:28:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7B1D23858409
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704385697;
	bh=GJAB9KTW8ojM1v+Fg3aDsMOX3lMm0Mqa+a1/GZnNKNg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XKD+LjOHzkJGnZNi9O8ntpuJFghuz2N5Qj3Td8EnbbeppMdzYwsflpD84ahPlQAO1
	 S1oN+p21kWccm9LMxopqLAOc+E4FPy55yopcnLkncMkeNQpCI6hjel1GOLPoDA65Ve
	 rbaDiZtfeU4qs9m/LmVEWR/eDicBHmqO+OdxnpIg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113228] [14 Regression] ICE:
 recalculate_side_effects, at gimplify.cc:3347
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:28:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113228-4-xYhOGN9qRi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113228

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > This seems like a reduced testcase, where is the original testcase from=
? Or
> > is it an automated code generator?
>=20
> This was found with the fuzzer we're using to try to nail down some spec
> fails in risc-v vector [1]. We've had some success with this approach.

Oh ok, I was deciding if I should look further into this or let someone else
handle it. Since it is from a fuzzer, I am just going to say I don't have t=
ime
to look into this latent bug even though I exposed it :).=