From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8EE4E385E45A; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:45:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8EE4E385E45A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705146325; bh=l+HmTEBGtEI30WpH0FKNuGhi6UIdb3Oqgg5hYLXXmwg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oz2Xa3Hz/MfUR6r32a6iiQ91iLAUuosPpfseqVGl4Y0bKftdgS2yts0VCcj7qaQqR dTq5kIj5QjyC5A1/U+bRoxZtak3VlDBJG2r1vh9PrPM66q3Y6PaB5em82oOTrIBARp 8+R5P2zU/CrN7oCN7mwFSUwMDUZ/AEhQe0D+Zcq4= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113230] 27_io/print/1.cc fails when run with qemu Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:45:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113230 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe that part of the test could just use { target { ! simulator } } It's testing something that is highly dependent on the runtime context. It's worth testing ... but only when we can control the context properly.=