From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8BB5C3858C35; Sun,  7 Apr 2024 08:37:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8BB5C3858C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712479038;
	bh=BpeycLppPKseP2lo/5+yB4RztIzmaovvUle7NORBJHI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RQ9fsKLDJGrXLWS1Z7IxlWhsOlGs0m03SxY4vx5oeYg4qfHlUaAAkO6qmk6QTixzK
	 /CRezCgPdgc5/MNmIFThUjO/2ExGxvFicLLmO24iihW/Towx22B/nzHXE+hDwZKvuD
	 T7paSxtjaLWYHq8vx8MGbS89RiMFNCCGoT1B7owI=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113233] LoongArch: target options from LTO objects not
 respected during linking
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 08:37:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-113233-4-c9l5GutPKc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113233

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #11 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I misunderstood the last change and this is not fixed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/648921.html=