From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A4A713858D32; Thu,  4 Jan 2024 17:05:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A4A713858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704387920;
	bh=iOOOxqnZlpjh9m/aTElQrj5A+M2CFpkB+yBimjv62gw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VHnapuh4q2q/vpYglXz4aHywjFl/fDtrOL8xF+2KlCntz5Qp1aDHNiPGVyAxuJnON
	 TloB8shyBunC54x6I8Jy0a0EsqqBTcN3WfHua1mw3TT6dKttX6Swsj5plQ48Vxmpno
	 lUD5rayJzKGBtFcsSGESHqGlr/Fx64+K+k4p2qMk=
From: "aros at gmx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113235] SMHasher SHA3-256 benchmark is almost 40% slower
 vs. Clang on AMD Zen 4
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:05:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aros at gmx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113235-4-NReIfMHD2a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113235

--- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros at gmx dot com> ---
Also valid for MTL:
https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-meteorlake-gcc-clang/2=