From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AE1743858C53; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:53:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE1743858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704387183; bh=3aNF4jHbyqfTMBczVZUl7NnDBKeoF6zpC9BZ6XuCXgI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=l+Am6Fu1c5zZCzyFD2RC6HkdsJCwD6yoDZIc6aKavGQTDrK8a/VbIHLsYQ5ssVcbv zeIrer55GMs35h26YuQkOITkCqFnRFUELv10vYntxd9CXs57Cfkn3mrBmJjdirb5od S6PqL/ObVskybmKYAe4wh5c+WLg6ODmqIFVLieRM= From: "aros at gmx dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/113235] New: SMHasher SHA3-256 benchmark is almost 40% slower vs. Clang on AMD Zen 4 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:53:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aros at gmx dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113235 Bug ID: 113235 Summary: SMHasher SHA3-256 benchmark is almost 40% slower vs. Clang on AMD Zen 4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: aros at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- According to Phoronix Test Suite SMHasher SHA3-256 is almost 40% slower when built with GCC 13.2/GCC git snapshort vs Clang: https://www.phoronix.com/review/gcc-clang-eoy2023/3 FormHash32 x86_64 AVX is also a lot slower.=