From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BF66F3858D38; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:19:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BF66F3858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704763199; bh=UJh3xsJUcAoaOM9B2xUl/LAh3QzYSNpxDhqXYc8IDvw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tcU1FOyADwarHnOgYng9u2gBiUH3v8hH+EPvyxnbXDYkFaHTTQnKejtWSib/fjykh 2GmJu80J0AiApf3/W4+8qth6wZqjyT4dqIdAERLjHSPJf0ZgxIUf71ZNCr+St1zH35 AJger+L23ge+CjL3+Yx7RNuxQjiRSLNGB5xtgD+k= From: "ewlu at rivosinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113249] RISC-V: regression testsuite errors -mtune=generic-ooo Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 01:19:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ewlu at rivosinc dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113249 --- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu --- (In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #2) > > If there are new execution failures that would be more concerning and > > indicate a real bug. > I've gone through a few of the differences between rocket and generic-ooo > and found PR113248 which Pan helped fix. I'm not familiar enough with rvv= to > be able to identify if there's a bug hidden in the assembly though. Whoops misread the author. Thanks to Pan and Juzhe for fixing the bug=