From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5E0DB3858C66; Tue,  9 Jan 2024 06:27:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5E0DB3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704781654;
	bh=2AJNzOz6c3lWTbs4OZwueNmE3wMfibt8qpwiO9Fp1kk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hkJEsdgQLaCCwae9wIbwSharWiKXARTb3NHYoPZKPqHsNzCXH7XEY/dYVXhlfoK/J
	 bYMqClnFnZtVzqfgwkkg/vwuucxv6Hkq0TRx5Htfs1MxXHq2SL5nK1OC9/WEodpo3E
	 AGIWBUCkpuYklzFeFON1H1K1M8y6P+bQb5KwqbPc=
From: "652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113271] [Regression] Wrong code at -O1/2/3
 since GCC-9 (could be due to wrong optimization)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 06:27:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113271-4-z5pc5ukysi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113271

--- Comment #3 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> -fsanitize=3Dundefined is even explicitly mentioned in the bug report
> guideline at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/.  And the red banner in the new bug
> page also mentions -fwrapv.

I'm sorry about this issue. I knew what you mentioned. I seemed a little ou=
t of
my mind when I brought up the issue.



(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> This is UB, as can be seen if you compile with -fsanitize=3Dundefined:

I'm sorry again.=