From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AA6CB385842F; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:43:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AA6CB385842F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704789825; bh=DWTTtIOkcZDieiMvGF2iJXhGEbHQv+8pwTahZAQPte8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cqa1YqOgQXi58zg4vZq7CFMtE5nM7umkCfjxCPhAPxVD6ho5cpUoV/xtvlWJ4yqoD cbl84zPp+hBwuOxmtJONzrivwfUWhwmOd57zw9U315heVjBtadjribhi117C3s87bN gHe7v5AbjS+ZhwDDEKnqptiLPKyC3q2ce9lK+nlQ= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:43:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, inline-asm, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113280 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Oh, and if the goal of the code is to put and keep the datum in a register,= the code should really use "+r" anyway!=