From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6C10B3858407; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:58:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C10B3858407 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704808728; bh=1kuIx3Wcqf3vKTtrUQyYyBFjygqu8PMByNPtntJirVU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cXKGbHB6bD6MAl+kxkaBssu7Yf2M/1FcfaZSBwjxt//rAWt5nmixUUG2BhLTziLHC aASD8769mNLq4CgwObsMXSR5e6jO0gDyCsLsM0cm7hJIKmyXSbYeYK6K7sqGKyLO5v 22Xbs+vnfx/1Exp9DWK2uEzku7h4fY/xVu3rUa4M= From: "iii at linux dot ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:58:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iii at linux dot ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113284 --- Comment #6 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Created attachment 57014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D57014&action=3Dedit patch v2 Thanks for the correction. I've noticed the function label and got tunnel vision; .opd does indeed contain no code, but only function and toc pointer= s, and we don't want that in ASAN reports. Would the attached patch be okay?= =20 It's basically your proposal, but with some code reuse.=