public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113295] New: SPEC 2006 416.gamess miscompares on Aarch64 when built with -Ofast -march=native -flto
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 17:42:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113295-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113295

            Bug ID: 113295
           Summary: SPEC 2006 416.gamess miscompares on Aarch64 when built
                    with -Ofast -march=native -flto
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
            Blocks: 26163
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: aarch64-linux
            Target: aarch64-linux

Our Aarch64 benchmarker (armv8.2-a+crypto+fp16+rcpc+dotprod+ssbs)
signals that SPEC 2006 416.gamess miscompares when built with -Ofast
-march=native -flto and master revision r14-7022-g34d339bbd0c1f5.

*** Miscompare of cytosine.2.out; 
1120:      1 C                0.027630132       0.018067739       0.002234116
           1 C             -223.432234062       7.107716215      -9.326017293
                                        ^
1121:      2 C                0.012259576      -0.006051645      -0.000067202
           2 C             -205.307990130    -173.019401916      -6.442472179
                                        ^
1122:      3 C               -0.012829758       0.003221329      -0.000743429
           3 C               -0.900001858    -263.923127366       3.131404191
                                        ^
1123:      4 N               -0.041204707       0.020932737      -0.000372560
           4 N              291.766837166    -257.876625173      10.788390925
                                        ^
1124:      5 C                0.057007688       0.032540385      -0.000909621
           5 C             -204.215830139      57.403322317      -0.929403441
                                        ^
1125:      6 N               -0.015041867      -0.049945043       0.002129121
           6 N              117.540483305     300.802327718     -10.562573219
                                        ^
1126:      7 O               -0.076442899      -0.041673056      -0.000117411
           7 O              481.672983389     238.169793443       3.121961894
                                        ^
1127:      8 N                0.034391335      -0.016048119      -0.001905357
           8 N             -247.780884876      91.547672097      -1.133077767
                                        ^
1128:      9 H                0.014938973       0.008953835       0.000373759
           9 H               -3.948185240       0.659195159      -0.007774350
                                        ^
1129:     10 H               -0.002268325       0.023480419       0.000010207
          10 H               -0.160267091      -4.621874235      -0.178161165


Unfortunately at the moment don't have another access to another
adequate Aarch64 machine to debug further and so at this time I cannot
provide more information (and so the component "target" is likely
bogus, sorry).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-09 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 17:42 jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-09 17:43 ` [Bug target/113295] [14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-19 13:13 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 10:25 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 10:32 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 11:07 ` [Bug target/113295] [14 Regression] SPEC 2006 416.gamess miscompares on Aarch64 when built with -Ofast -mcpu=native since g:2f46e3578d45ff060a0a329cb39d4f52878f9d5a tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 11:09 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 18:37 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 14:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 14:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 14:17 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113295-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).