From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AB2C2385842C; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:43:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AB2C2385842C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704915827; bh=DWeKwC1wObwFCgC/XT29PigcrMwKbbdvz+KIy+1vjGE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gxfxdD1tuYJtCu6RD5rHrLqtjLvSDLglQfvwHLUQlZ0jvwsLgZwvfJmQ/Lt7iiqQz 5OQ/GD/qX5msS2W1Rk2noc3/MrQHo5YcieNEcpkiXTkW4CHmxIvL3rzZD67rVu6Cjk uy5Q3yKdSvs2RZxhqhCu9kruyhLAu6JhAd8o6PW4= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/113305] ICE with do concurrent and ivdep Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:43:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113305 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The underlying problem is that parse_do_block expects only simple do-loops and attaches the loop annotation (ivdep, vector, novector, ...) to the "wrong" component (ext.iterator instead of ext.forall_iterator). However, gfc_forall_iterator has a slightly different structure than gfc_iterator and needs to be amended. Since the Intel compiler appears to accept "!DIR$ vector always" in front of do concurrent, we might try to support it, too.=