From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 99A4D3858C66; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 05:38:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99A4D3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704951516;
	bh=jFXNE588yf/X/Hxb8u+eYevSF8jwKKf/OmFLEiTlaVw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xYLSljYGp5rvFw6fP9ZT7vp3KSq5FYDtNePvj2KfPwfgFN2QCTdYPFqrch5CdPmPn
	 JqVn8BomJVKT53cN5tCRI6nhqaXz7bKpK3t+ILiIpC1BMZF/Z2lh/lMReCRu6b+8Bz
	 U+e2PzUAfUPS+chmeeaSPuEIMB8gZwtmiiA5uiyg=
From: "liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113312] Update __attribute__((interrupt)) for Intel FRED
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 05:38:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113312-4-4XDTHsBVre@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113312

Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #10)
> Right, is there such an attribute (that's what I'm asking for in bug 1035=
03)?
No, I'll try to support that in GCC15.
>=20
> All I see in the gcc documentation is no_calle*R*_saved_registers, which,
> again, is the exact opposite.=