From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 330DF3858D38; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:12:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 330DF3858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711383159;
	bh=DY7L1dQ/Jjro0CwFiQvFYPPSsAMdhnA4U2H3mKpJ5Qc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mouqUjZN9jylvkcZ5Uk0pX5G4tvR2MSTU/1UleA9HLs1nGjGRN8HE4W1pZpYmiLWo
	 15tE8HrqQpNNzvYunzZhtAQlkjLIguxe+UPCEjf9gLjjKC3ql0+jpBuStMw5XCMUUN
	 B7rXs7HtvyYaAAd5CUSyxSpq9yF3rA+v25a88OdA=
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/113314] [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop false
 positive seen on haproxy's fd.c
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:12:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113314-4-wx3UFe0kp5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113314

--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)

[...]

>     70	redo_next:
>     71	  next =3D fdtab[fd].update.next;
>     72	  if (next > -2)
>     73	    goto done;
>     74	  if (next =3D=3D -2)
>     75	    goto redo_next;
>=20
> does look like an infinite loop when next =3D=3D 2.

Presumably I meant -2 here.=