From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DF6DC3857837; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:53:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DF6DC3857837
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704981194;
	bh=7qyAZm4Ymd1SJ59UubeHfBphGUBJVQ98vn2Rv4SQzHM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qL+xUVbk4G5B/AoLkcYEnuifiXVYGiUxrz8ajpYb90ZwV5oJHc55Fl/GRZBkCTv5q
	 KJax5iDQ5QDGlivaGE9XRfgCq2LkaDN8pOMiXWrzEJIb3j3kvF7Cp/2AglxrLCiVsN
	 fUe2TEEE3ohkJc2GXa4UfKoYZ7TSBQKcutOuM3E0=
From: "jules at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/113317] New test case libgomp.c++/ind-base-2.C fails with
 ICE
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:53:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jules at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113317-4-0k9yi0hlbJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113317

jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jules at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I haven't been able to reproduce this with our local testing infrastructure=
 on
the powerpc64le machine available to me (i.e., the test works for me there).
I'd be a bit surprised about a machine dependence at this early stage in
parsing, but here we go!

Let me know if there's any other information that might help track this dow=
n.=