From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D5229385828C; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:22:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D5229385828C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705054964; bh=DFNAS6Bk4NSTmlWkT+zmJRwT5OahFs+GMVsE1MYAdsw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vzqjMyk4ZhNWrbGrlzx2wXv/jsjdA4qKvFSkRjupua9t+WMXruCff1mxl4MBziYTg JlMDnod6OSovL6wHqHIX30xfPLaNyLplD64rMagNV76w7VISBgTaGAvWXQYSfFSEMw qhFVRdQxmUgwj7rVOzXqtJ3Qjw8ZiqvNEeeFr22g= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr' with -O -fstack-check=generic and _BitInt() Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:22:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113330 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c08f0dde4c2a48931a61b84a00d5c16f4b0e291 commit r14-7181-g4c08f0dde4c2a48931a61b84a00d5c16f4b0e291 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Jan 12 11:22:04 2024 +0100 sra: Punt for too large _BitInt accesses [PR113330] This is the case I was talking about in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642423.html and Zdenek kindly found a testcase for it. We can only create BITINT_TYPE with precision at most 65535, not 65536, so need to punt if we'd want to create it. 2024-01-12 Jakub Jelinek PR tree-optimization/113330 * tree-sra.cc (create_access): Punt for BITINT_TYPE accesses wi= th too large size. * gcc.dg/bitint-69.c: New test.=