From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 48E513858D33; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 04:05:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 48E513858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707192303; bh=h3wqjZczEVubkX/JLMcPphWSEY/goj3RkTMhZTZN7xs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=huLY1Jay9RvUcJeWcLybzVSfw3wASWL27pPvvEPn/X8I6T2zKVzwBFAfPMOFE2p/U i79sNZZa17QMDZ1I1SLZX0tBaJgeGLKzeLws9DMzy1MVW3rXSt41v2kTMeLV90odN4 E1HSEFLQaTz7fM15jJD723aYK75SaFJ8bs65XPLc= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/113332] [12/13/14 regression] checking ICE when building fcitx-5.1.6 Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 04:05:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113332 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- Another reduced valid testcase: struct tuple { template static constexpr bool __is_implicitly_default_constructible() { return tr= ue; } template()> tuple(); }; struct DBusStruct { DBusStruct() =3D default; tuple data_; }; struct IBusService { int m =3D [] { DBusStruct{}; return 42; }(); };=