From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EFF043858001; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:18:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EFF043858001 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706206689; bh=LF/eict48nJtUzAFK/ttaWxgZnFgyNXmMnvM+YKGf+M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mjBATYnYiD+k8YtOjZfOMpfnCz1EkVgt51vf8TpyhKqpCTGIxI7WIYM0PLiCAhdvO R2oZZv7MfOL2p0oawXfQKw4R77IPfZuSD2ANb7ElC7mlFgY9Xfg5kvVdQcU1/KTnrT 9XsWk6OgUbEZojRLvYvif1TMgLZv3NyPW+pegyiQ= From: "roger at nextmovesoftware dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/113336] libatomic (testsuite) regressions on arm Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:18:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113336 Roger Sayle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|roger at nextmovesoftware dot com |unassigned at gcc d= ot gnu.org Summary|libatomic (testsuite) |libatomic (testsuite) |regressions on |regressions on arm |armv6-linux-gnueabihf | --- Comment #4 from Roger Sayle --- Hi Victor, Yes, I agree your approach is better/less invasive than mine. I simply cop= ied the existing idiom in Makefile.am, not noticing that this adds more functionality to libatomic than is strictly required. Just adding the missing/required tas_1_2_.lo is better (and hopefully more acceptable to the maintainers/reviewers).=