From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1DCA53857C5C; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:23:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1DCA53857C5C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705008189;
	bh=B7HPVtom54dJzHbzYlLqrobqPFEuT1UbVs8fwNOiys8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uT4AoUrXqhJIsLp4JTL12VptsyOp7/0k65ny7UZOww/gFd0SbdD/kGYROSq97yVH8
	 hZ8GENQzGND4KY3EfZ4PzBy4ajymOf1CYl3Tw6QyzS+bTjw5J7/hqD4Jt57kLXUed5
	 s8+oQupYz214/iIoWiyyQMbqhwRK+GKJB5R30AM8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113339] `-a/-b` is not simplified to `a/b` if
 done in seperate statements
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:23:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113339-4-TqZH4BxWOM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113339-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113339-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113339

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So I looked into the wrong part of fold, but anyways PR 23669 added the fol=
ding
to fold instead (and I just noticed I implemented it originally).=