From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DAF853858D32; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 09:22:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DAF853858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705224158; bh=Ks+891CZe2pCskf81BIIfd/FMdGMVv+xYxvBasJj6NM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MpNrGmsbz2R8hxuvzPBVWbA7j49hSUzVZW1uGYrJt38ohgTUgklY6rf+mMOsMNvhK 77/DkunZaGH7LVLdJ5V/Jq0iqdQdUq6rsJb7KZLeUvFsqWHargLn1Kr8k997w6vF8P gmkY/FUZ9NbkltaCzl4zEIM1IQFzs8XemoXxVOlU= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 09:22:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113363 Paul Thomas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-14 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- >=20 > Both allocation with source and assignment are broken :-( With numerical output from foo ([1,2,3,4,5]), we get: 1 3 5 33 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 So allocation with source is broken here as well but assignment is OK.=