From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D50083858C98; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:12:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D50083858C98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712257953; bh=f9NggZ5c1734mRF0rq0sEzSLUKBKohyItLwGQEdZ7/E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jq3pjewuDb4oQhmKKPL+VxEgZsM9F9sASfDX3D2BmysRlJZCxnt6pjIdo8tYp4qtJ U0Vo/3izc+FPfoh1/P3zdfaZQavb4InUVVhi2GB2p+GEWvwCHVJLMbzch53U5IxlPx LTVqJjrWus7m3WOZ5SupTW3cITwG4xtTwDpSK4tU= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:12:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113363 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |REOPENED --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > > This PR has been fixed as part of the large commit r14-9489-g3fd46d859c= da10 . >=20 > Not here. As far as I can tell the results remain exactly the same for bo= th > character and numeric results from 'foo'. Oops, I only checked that comment#0 is fixed (-> gfortran.dg/associate_66.f= 90) and overlooked the other case in comment#1. Reopening. Regarding ALLOCATE with SOURCE and CHARACTER, I have a partial patch for pr113793. Need to look again into that one.=