From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 53AA83858D28; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:11:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 53AA83858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705104695;
	bh=nnjeyLAgYJTCJpNts1/HKHirVC/1iEK7XIFnjmE2q4w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hj6i7BHdhrguu1ZMa8gKNw21tI4b6CQ+JR0pDOuu354WL0wNiWlc3mDfshzyyIeX0
	 fXDQpR3JN5/eyJjPxZyQ1790I78W/btXDLx9gDVKHXQnbMId6UYK5ffO92YBfWMrUw
	 Bg3HBm4Z29XnkXUFI8xVrRbVqnSjMEVxpSs+sOYs=
From: "newbie-02 at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113365] LONG DOUBLE: denormals: assigning a constant:
 factor 100 slow,
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:11:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: newbie-02 at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113365-4-mrbsxcLxi8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113365

--- Comment #3 from newbie-02 <newbie-02 at gmx dot de> ---
hi, thank you, super service, super fast, works!=20=20

can't tell if the -O0 behaviour is meaningful ...=20=20
but think it is rarely used. I came to it in my=20=20
attempts to avoid compiler cheating / optimizing.=