From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 61B403858C41; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:46:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 61B403858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705329985;
	bh=371LSL1D1yI15RfNRRa2LOfooaEhfKoTQIfjf3G3tq4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NfRbtF0wdBngSKFgxfmDr44hmThzpYjxHnZkgwL5ZU9g8qub7nCiHMUU0xBPYkQSm
	 /8eti9WCwTeEEC88ugjASUSNt8jwzWm6hbmDOapyiIa20bQ4e1t2WkHHNlyZ2g8Fg/
	 KYTFd0BfNFBfqOB6v+vollVD7+DIzvSeWM8yqsuc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113386] [C++23] std::pair comparison operators should
 be transparent, but are not in libstdc++
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:46:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113386-4-QlOtJO5AOe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113386-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113386-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113386

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> We will do it as a DR against all previous standards, as we do for most D=
Rs.

That should have said "as we do for most issues", sorry. All the major impls
treat most library issues as DRs, applying the fixes to all affected standa=
rds
modes.

But as this particular issue changes operator<=3D> and is motivated by rang=
es,
I'm tempted to say it's only a DR against C++20, nothing older. If people w=
ant
it for older standards, they can contribute the patch to change the pre-C++=
20
operator!=3D, operator< etc. overloads.=