From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A8CCC3858C66; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:57:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8CCC3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705503473;
	bh=Qq55mXRGim9/iwS6RAhcx8GWwawQepIKMhva7GChE6s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QTTPJaY9UFSYaax/Nj8ZzwQ8SR15AbHV5lFhmkN/j2KHJAp1kr1VmfZzFw8OOEEKk
	 4fxA31KMr43iICdkC03v9bPjTq36a1BQUUT06o1jP8I0FEYbs+zSIFwk+dApcdc1wP
	 lMx7o9f0gB+xei2adqqr0PicssH0gvvkrAzByVgo=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/113399] [14 Regression] -ffold-mem-offsets should not be
 a target option
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:57:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113399-4-nZ8oAqxdvs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113399-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113399-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113399

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just something that was missed when this option was changed from target
dependent to target independent.  It definitely should not be a target opti=
on.=