public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:00:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113402-4-K1b2rbJzkb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113402-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-15
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57087
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57087&action=edit
gcc14-pr113402.patch

Untested fix.

Though, I wonder if we also shouldn't rename those symbols, having __builtin_
prefix in the names is highly undesirable.  Weren't we contemplating disabling
support of defining or even declaring __builtin_* functions/variables
altogether several times?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-15 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-15 16:38 [Bug libgcc/113402] New: Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 16:44 ` [Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1 fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 17:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-15 20:30 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16  8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-28 11:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-31 18:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-31 18:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-17  2:47 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-17 15:43 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2024-03-27 15:49 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113402-4-K1b2rbJzkb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).