From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 705623858C54; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:30:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 705623858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705350628; bh=jchSBQXuPpm7A/FXstdLM4HmPZoxQP9r8SZd1F9Foak=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UvQEd5UH5VaKNZDnoiUzLgB7gysYhS8rmWz0y7yHcztxIRGHjuoKAcd1Tc4xr3DHE FnLIGeEXACWyuzoIExLT1sbmUzMewuVChEgzgsOANqTOV0BB7DHguj9/MWqGthXG4b Qvc2/wZ3GggOkgApINhe1jvYD9rC8maBdvsH+soI= From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:30:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113402 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 57087 [details] > gcc14-pr113402.patch >=20 >=20 > Though, I wonder if we also shouldn't rename those symbols, having __buil= tin_ > prefix in the names is highly undesirable.=20 We can easily do this now, if needed; since this is the first release it wo= uld have least impact.=