From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 78D5738582B6; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 10:06:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 78D5738582B6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709719566;
	bh=E6lBr5SXwAjqHm0SHfLgSkyRz9S3pyjqIqfUm4X2b8g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=He3mZvTPp1F6Q8Bx2AjLeG9fSUDB+GFO1Xha8KgMO2bxfUWHNgbOHdTAP9hGMb3iB
	 F0zDlxFc0JnvpxqEyke4d7FXz2ZRAxHhISgYiuzg7SyMZeB3GMt6uxCMMO64Nfp3ZN
	 OUZjmEHpgE0Bxpi0czldbRt6An5s3/udw/QlILiM=
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/113428] [14 regression]
 gcc.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-c-3.c fails after r14-7158-gb5476e4c881b0d
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:06:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113428-4-eKtyVz6wIm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113428-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113428-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113428

--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
/* { dg-warning {cast to pointer from integer of different size} "" { target
*-*-* } .-2 } */

I'm guessing it's this that's causing the problem because int and int* are =
the
same size on 32-bit targets.  So would changing the test to:

-  int arr[20];
+  char arr[20];

be enough?  AFAIK we don't have any targets with 8-bit pointers.=