From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 449513858403; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:06:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 449513858403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710511576; bh=cM0lwayfa49HvkS9jdtC7+xUQjmkWnDzBcAqcoBNbfI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CbS8bU8cF8tr3E1IhBOCUArvKwpSOO41jcd5lbrNUkDNkaC5aaID+lNEYn4EM5+NC un3TJz+ri1UoRQT1GQGJ+EZoRdc0Y0oL50XYfvck2VOYlofVmhl4cwQuosd8g8XpTy fOpirYYFpgUF+AYO1fcqgWkLUMulb5C1UQA8qbMw= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113431] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:06:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113431 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, trying that in a cross to arm, with -march=3Darmv9-a -munaligned-ac= cess it matches (in that case I believe vect_hw_misalign should be true), but it matches even with -march=3Darmv9-a -mno-unaligned-access (and in that case I think it should be !vect_hw_misaligned target). That said, sure, if it is /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimized: basic block part vectorize= d" 2 "slp1" { target { vect_int && vect_hw_misaligned } } } } */ then it will simply not test anything on the non-vect_hw_misaligned targets, rather than say XPASS, so maybe that is ok. Richi, thoughts on that?=