public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [14 Regression] Fail to fold the last element with multiple loop since g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:08:48 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113441-4-3Mcv1twKoA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113441-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441 --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The x86 and "emulation" paths handle narrowing/widening during code generation (but yes, the IFN path doesn't). A fix would be to do similar as for the gs_info.decl case in vectorizable_load/store and handle select cases of widening/narrowing (2x) and adjust vect_check_gather_scatter accordingly. That might be against the spirit of how the IFN support was laid out (possibly to be "cleaner"), but I don't see a good way to avoid the very premature (during pattern selection) load/store vectorization choosing for the cases there are multiple possibilities as seen here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 8:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-01-17 12:38 [Bug c/113441] New: [14 Regression] Fail to fold the last element with multiple loop juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-17 12:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113441] " juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-17 13:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 14:07 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-17 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-22 12:38 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-22 12:41 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-22 12:42 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-22 13:19 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-22 13:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-22 16:16 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-22 22:16 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-23 6:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 8:15 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-23 8:17 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-01-23 8:25 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-23 10:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-01-23 10:30 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 12:32 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 12:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 13:05 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 13:12 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-23 13:21 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-23 13:28 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-22 16:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [14 Regression] Fail to fold the last element with multiple loop since g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-26 8:10 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-26 8:17 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-02-27 8:01 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-27 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-02-29 22:18 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-01 9:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-01 9:53 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-01 10:44 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-03-04 12:07 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 13:26 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 14:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 14:48 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 15:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 15:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 16:16 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-04 22:52 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-05 8:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-03-05 10:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-07 20:50 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 7:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113441-4-3Mcv1twKoA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).