From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 659093858CDB; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 659093858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705502157;
	bh=Oqy5BS5pXXdPDxz3aekpEwQRj5rYG8aFME0WOh+r7Tc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dB2YHAuaV56cAM687nkDj/IN3bRp/A7+SDZyfVxTu6grHVE/IigE5ytiDrIqn/qqC
	 wPIl/S+aQ0skP9eq3Czr6D+ESUX1rz0Xwrj9YF5rC2a0W9njCl6fh/xi7njHAxXNPn
	 mLyFCzilsgGPY5z+Bf9XnlW/5jzfV0d7V5ltVJnI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113441] [13/14 Regression] Fail to fold the
 last element with multiple loop
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:35:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-113441-4-raMVkZn89S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113441-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113441-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113441

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |13.2.0
      Known to fail|                            |14.0

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
let's wait for bisection=