From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E4DA43858C42; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:51:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E4DA43858C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708591895; bh=2lDvwHqTIHw1DhwIX81KQ9ge0lxZFlbLa3avta+/CdM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I4zBtIy+Ur2f+eE2aAG3wQ/6n1Z7JzOpG+JN7NeRbeb0h03Gl7taer6kNa1SNYYEz FDvojhiDgFhzXF2ZoBiJSGAidigQHKKm+jj22Gb89XcSnRfs6MBAkNMbTUqrMjJ6u3 CwWGq0ceBAA48BXwcetcsvvdokjvkiIAZRVQxf2k= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:51:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113450 --- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #17 from Joseph S. Myers --- > The tests that GCC's internal notion of the types agrees with the headers= are > in gcc.dg/c99-stdint-5.c and gcc.dg/c99-stdint-6.c. Ah, now I remember: they had to be adjusted back in the day for various omissions on Solaris and Tru64 UNIX. During my recent test bootstrap, they didn't show up because I had changed and sol2.h's INT8_TYPE etc. in lockstep, so no inconsistencies occured.=