From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4FE623858CDB; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:40:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4FE623858CDB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708954826; bh=8EeCaTd/Y3BfMq+XBqOAdk/QcN11bkLUW7FJPQhWkWs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LA2pnrInB9uea6HRk0Q4ThahyzrTL8XRa7sIUwlVbf+Sq0QH9m0SSXkZ69vPWMUjp y8mVV4kt6/cMItslxC7CZJYtV4ZHwEdUTsqOB0/u0Y0P8bCv8rEAguETrguTaCiKK/ mJNYOSs4wqxJRuk7TYtPjNBM2j4SyO8O2e9AB4hI= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:40:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113450 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I'm talking with Oracle Solaris Engineering and they're amenable to making the int8_t change from char to signed char. To assess the possible impact, the plan is to compare the public symbols of C++ libraries delivered with Solaris now and after a rebuild with changed. Are there other important issues to consider with such a change?=