From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 416DE3858CDB; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:11:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 416DE3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708445465;
	bh=0VGn8YgYhidZJQJWtOQwOlRgZmhn/Sa64/inMQfzNYo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=F2jWjUSqnnY8c+p3pX+OE7+iCegRt39u10Dc+19Ls1wgP8oFQZJhvVylNX9vY+F6w
	 7C/mfUgfLbBior05FKgmLmnvPHaNQJOJbWO6LDTwpjNkW1oVMkd7mzmZ6x1gtSGwSr
	 icc3O//9er+FbilMWP/8dPED6zxtj3CzqSfrIMYI=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression]
 std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:11:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113450-4-zbdfGudaT5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113450

--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It's technically an ABI break, since void f(int8_t) would mangle differen=
tly.
> It probably wouldn't affect much in practice, but would still be a break.

Still, given how serious Sun/Oracle is about ABI compatibility (and
always has been), I'm doubtful they would be amenable to the idea.=