From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EE5DB3858D33; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:41:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EE5DB3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705560072;
	bh=teSEpS0lBQI9WNfFE8idAjNBd1tZPgndWypGbNAghJQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GNeP6DvwjNOjxYfpi/d3/XfG82YJBIsAfkIXJNK5+edqE6mzwOjaIkIPtuBjWggsZ
	 BhmHWXcOfOttSp9DV2ZPcBPbd8CNANBVsIEUh3KYPRjhcopmHc67r7cN7TfvDw/9OC
	 wakntItffDKU8c95J2I7SKneqacRsJ56rzcYBMOo=
From: "newbie-02 at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/113455] ROUNDING: IEEE Standard: Missing decimal rounding
 mode 'nearest, ties away from zero' for decimalxxx datatypes.
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:41:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: newbie-02 at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113455-4-FLzUirawxO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113455

--- Comment #4 from newbie-02 <newbie-02 at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #3)=20=20

:-)  - thank you, you are my hero,=20=20

> If you're doing arithmetic with constant operands, it might be
> folded at compile time; make sure you're using -frounding-math to avoid t=
hat.

Think that was it, using volatile variables makes a difference.=20=20
( I hate! cheating compilers and I hate me again and again seeking for that
same trap ... sorry )=20=20=20

reg. 'availability': think that 'modul' / each 'modul' which provides the
datatype should also provide the rounding mode ... good logic? Effort to
implement is once, users seeking would be over and over again ... endless .=
..
not good.=