From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 63C333858CD1; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:36:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 63C333858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705567014; bh=kCRD6osBipeIdftNQKtnB3jhT7SiK7ninuDNwxJZiOQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g5NcAdpNa7uN0XUmFVWmPeVpC73JvZeyHT9l9E2ylpNYWHpoK2I6Hkq0pAorl42uA BUOS/NUBOurQ2BiIu8UfFzCDUMzuPww+0GDTNd4m8BT727ITaR8j7HyLu860rWYx1w 8Twpwk42QKE4liot30LDMMiIQbIYHUpaYpgEzCS0= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113458] Missed SLP for reduction of multiplication/addition with promotion Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:36:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed component bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113458 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-18 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|tree-optimization |target Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, I have to double check but I suspect the issue is there is no v4qi mode for aarch64 currently but it could be added as emulated as basically v8qi except load/store as s0. Let me see if that helps there. The biggest thing is I have to make sure of= is the abi does not change for vector(4) char too (the aarch64 backend uses mo= de in some cases still).=