From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0D9743858C2D; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 07:06:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D9743858C2D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705648011;
	bh=Ese4AZm36QGS1zrWvRQ+TcYKdkY7zgJXi+Nmn7aEvHk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sHqQA8JLYY65LMaGHUEavrWHkTw/ZNGoOMvUIWT/7FwA8cBFB++Z6xMN88T1y0tMc
	 zbyktgPkbVw0fxwAPhx5bUpzu88ZKoN9S37DpOwqEdS7nx0YO8D3ZTZQ35z24tY62v
	 jmA3YjMd5E1wlCLW7rcEOJ78PWVLaTqboGJpL8CM=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113467] [14 regression] libgcrypt-1.10.3 is
 miscompiled
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 07:06:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113467-4-cvdNBWY5qF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113467-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113467-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113467

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #14)
> I tried 'if (candidate && candidate->src !=3D EDGE_PRED (loop->latch,
> 0)->src)' as well given that seems way more sensible and that works too, =
but
> obviously if I pick something eager or always true, it's going to help, so
> I'll wait for you now.

Yeah, that's what it meant to read - sorry for fat-fingering this so many
times.

Your other choice makes it simply never vectorize anything while this should
really just disable all early-exit-peeled variants.=