From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DD0483858C42; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:25:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DD0483858C42
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708514702;
	bh=q0S7eKQQeI30+ckuXNuT35CdwrgxTngvoOoaqb3NBw0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LZEPWU+gxbwk5cOTy5Bj7UeRLoOE4PCn94Ip5gjk2HhAy3S2gk5LOUKSAckEy8N6f
	 D/T9mYTWsam3YrLjY7VS9oW/F0DEWWHzFHw+dlZGKhregNkxAQy7y68r7zSP/Aeml2
	 vrwAticS9feDjOIPdkJTJVpzTt1hxI1WJMIlzYjo=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113476] [14 Regression] irange::maybe_resize
 leaks memory via IPA VRP
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:25:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113476-4-CgLwQOvuC5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113476

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11)
> Both patches pass test.  Up to the release maintainers to decide if they
> want to include them in this release.  Otherwise, I'll queue them up for
> later.

This is an important regression, why shouldn't it be included in GCC 14?
GCC trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes...=