From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 824413858D39; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 06:15:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 824413858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705731358;
	bh=RzSUrZB3zl+UiNkbtTXgCzrjNrWBJChb+Spude1ewnE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sf1Tt4fJ0t+4u1vxBRllHFyQZupD/1Y6Ndo1dJuV1nj6bNdmMeR6G3OloVV+h5vMQ
	 x9RMmGP5px8jYrNntZY5xBcqJNBtaUxcpHwmfpoc/Dgh3NzNCcQnDgvjZ0Dt158SEp
	 OGJyqvXFshUwZ78QWrdqhi6ahQXjWYmDbXQMg6q0=
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/113492] [14 Regression] ICE: in composite_type_internal, at
 c/c-typeck.cc:557 with -std=c2x -funsigned-bitfields since r14-6808
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 06:15:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zsojka at seznam dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113492-4-h54d4c7ZHB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113492

--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #2)
>=20
> I agree that "int:3" with -funsigned-bitfields should produce a type which
> is compatible to one  with "unsigned:3" and that forming a composite type
> has to work.
>=20
> I am not entirely sure this should be considered a regression as this C23
> feature did not exist before (but was rejected and did not ICE).  Anyway,=
 I
> will look at this and post a patch. Thanks for reporting.

Thank you for having a look.

The "regression" part is for the ICEing.=