From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BF3243858C42; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 03:14:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BF3243858C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705634086; bh=FHZiOxY5PkRw+A+WyRehzJzBkkV6QiehRL364W131jw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Qxfe0spwf+ipD0029+ip0+b8APcGM5UGGcXZymTNSlm1tbGk/yQPhm4Ts17V2RsMP nwUBAmj+mqV9j+WmrjsUvdzGef9ZVAw+zxrS+0IGP5LhXvSE7OXfpV1fTthE2LYh/u UBhZZhaU+sdumXGaCcQUXaNsEjwKlkCx8dDgoYkg= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/113495] RISC-V: Time and memory awful consumption of SPEC2017 wrf benchmark Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 03:14:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113495 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > How sparse is this bitmap will be? bitmap instead of sbitmap should be u= sed > if the bitmap is going to be sparse. sbitmap is a fixed sized based on the > bitmap size while bitmap is better for sparse bitmaps as it is implemented > as linked list. Also it seems like DF already has def_in/def_out info, how much is duplicat= ed information from there?=