From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 45DAE3858C56; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:44:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 45DAE3858C56 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705671882; bh=iNnW6xsPcaMXXOODgqRF06JZRI0zAy1L2kCpguYLuME=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B3pAh7EqF2RnXHBEUHtPi6eZDi58HfgY5pvoR074mcGjZatdTw3GG+1DD3vELaWfm rp3+j862fHx4lA9XTMQJ0GmSwJmukBBilDeOFyVJkeSCvWvfgT0i8hcoN2Wdef6E+g CL8GIUak/gi7a65MfrMaYIHJCiPebPM+Mj5Ep6BA= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113500] Using std::format with float or double based std::chrono::time_point causes error: no match for 'operator<<' Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:44:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113500 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > (In reply to Hirthammer from comment #5) > > This whole thing with std::format and std::chrono::time_point is curren= tly a > > total minefield. >=20 > That seems like an exaggeration. >=20 > > In MSVC it is even more complicated and I already reported > > the bug in October 2023. See: > >=20 > > https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/Using-std::format-with- > > unsigned-integer-/10501153 > >=20 > > If you change the clock to utc_clock or gps_clock the code compiles with > > MSVC (but not with GCC) on Compiler Explorer. >=20 > It compiles fine with GCC for me. Ah, maybe you mean your original example. The one at in the MSVC bug report compiles fine with GCC using utc_clock and gps_clock. Your original example doesn't, because formatting a utc_time or gps_time is specified in terms of a sys_time, and that's how libstdc++ implements it. S= o if the utc_time or gps_time uses a float rep, we're back to square one. I'll ask the committee to clarify that too.=